Experian’s 2020 Global Identity & Fraud Report explores inconsistencies between businesses’ views of their ability to meet their customers’ needs, and customer experiences with those businesses. It also underscores the opportunity for companies like yours to differentiate from the competition through the ways you engage with customers, with emphasis on how you identify and recognise them each time they interact with your business. Experian appreciates that many companies find it challenging to evolve traditional business models in order to meet the expectations of ‘always-on’ customers. But we also believe that customers’ identity verification and ongoing recognition (re-recognition) can be driving forces for greatly improved and more profitable customer relationships.

This is a small infographic created by ISACA that outlines key findings from their COVID-19 study done in April 2020.

The following report provides insights about what did and did not change in status and viewpoints between 2019 and 2020 and why.

Against the backdrop of mounting threat in an era of disruption, the most forward-thinking cybersecurity functions can be critical agents of change. But this will require organizations to foster new relationships between CISOs, the board and C-suite, and every function of the business.

The goal of the study was to provide a state-of-the-market on third-party risk with actionable recommendations that organizations can take to grow and mature their programs.

Overview of deployment of TLS encryption in the general internet and Alex Top 1000 sites.

Ponemon Institute is pleased to present the findings on the economics of today’s Security Operations Centers (SOC). Sponsored by Respond Software, Ponemon Institute surveyed 637 IT and IT security practitioners in organizations that have a SOC and are knowledgeable about cybersecurity practices in their organizations. Respondents supervise or are responsible for such activities as information security, threat detection and remediation and security operations management and more.

The 2019 Dark Reading State of IT Operations and Security Operations survey uncovered some important developments in the way enterprises are managing security in the data center – and in the boardroom. Here are some key takeaways: • 57% of respondents said IT and security staff communicate well, up from 47% last year. • 20% of organizations involve the security team at the start of every major IT project. • 69% of respondents say that the security team holds primary responsibility for compliance and privacy; this figure rose significantly – more than 12% – from our 2018 survey. • 90% of organizations expect the security team to take charge of developing and setting security policy. • 80% said the IT operations team is primarily responsible for patch management. • 20% of organizations have a distinct security department that operates separately from the IT team. • 18% of organizations have a fully-staffed security function. • 37% said the security operations team is most likely to be the first to detect and alert others about security incidents in the organization.

Gemalto outlines changes to threats in 2017, including data from incidents in the year.

Using survey data from 2,500 security professionals who indicated they have some measure of privacy responsibilities, this report provides analysis on the ROI for privacy efforts, maturity of privacy programs, vendor selection, and other topics.

This report from Pew Research Center goes over how and where the average person’s personal information is used online. It goes over the lack of control most people feel, who collects your data, the lack of understanding people have over who uses their data, and how people think about the privacy and vulnerability of their personal data.

This is a survey conducted by Cisco, mainly talking about their findings that people care about privacy, and a surprisingly large number have already taken actions to protect it.

This report goes in-depth into trends in healthcare data security, surveying 26,000 companies and analyzing terabytes of information.

Each year, industry leaders from around the world submit an application to be a speaker at RSA Conference. This year, we received 2,400 responses to our 2020 Call for Speakers. By sifting through all the entries, we were able to identify 10 trends that weaved their way through many of the submissions. Examining these trends provides a glimpse of what will be on the minds of cybersecurity professionals in 2020,

Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner began its survey of data breach class action litigation six years ago to rectify the information gap and to provide our clients, as well as the broaderlegal, forensic, insurance, and security communities,with reliable and accurate information concerning the risk associated with data breach litigation. Our annual survey continues to be the leading authority on data breach class action litigation and is widely cited throughout the data security community.

This paper provides a review and analysis of 2018 cyber incidents and key trends to address.

Whether accidental or malicious, insider incidents can result in financial fraud, privacy abuses, intellectual property theft, or damage to infrastructure. It’s difficult for security pros to detect this suspicious activity because insiders need to have privileged access to data to do their jobs. Since insiders are people and, therefore, entitled to privacy and due process, security pros must handle these incidents with greater care than external threats. This report describes how to build an insider threat program.

This report focuses specifically on data threats in the healthcare industry.

This paper discusses the top five Cybersecurity Technology Buying Trends.

From the report, “ONE OF THE most important priorities of a state chief information officer (CIO) is to reduce risk to their state. Cybersecurity and reducing cyber risk, specifically, is top of mind for every state CIO and many factors contribute to this. For example, it is unknown how many cyberattacks have been attempted on state government collectively, but one state estimates that two years ago there were 150 million attacks a day, while today there is an average of 300 million attacks per day. The same state has seen as many as 800 to 900 million in one day. "

This paper discusses all of the consequences for GDPR non-compliance.